REDEMPTION!

[Bluedevil19]

So back in july i submited my redemption for my 2009 cat osterman red ink auto #/10 and today they sent me a 2007 Mia Hamm blue ink auto #/200! They said this is of egual value but i cant figure out how that makes sense! Is there anything i can do?

 

[Bluedevil19]

Supposed to be this,

And i got this instead, :/

How is that equal value??????????

 

[Ground Support]

I like the Mia Hamm better IMO.

 

[paparoke]

I would email the company and complain. It doesn't seem right. I don't see how the company can put out redemption cards and not honor them. Tell them you are not satisfied and they will probably send you something else.

 

[35MorrisonFan]

The Hamm is the better card. Unless you collect Osterman that is!:mad4:

 

[iLikePie]

rather have the osterman

 

[scittlz]

Is the Hamm for trade?! I gotta have it! PM me if we can work something out

 

[tigsfan]

This means that Osterman most likely refused to sign any of the cards and/or they never got returned to Topps. What value do you think the Osterman would've got trade wise? I think it is fair considering the Hamm books for $200!

 

[Bluedevil19]

This means that Osterman most likely refused to sign any of the cards and/or they never got returned to Topps. What value do you think the Osterman would've got trade wise? I think it is fair considering the Hamm books for $200!

Where did you get that bv from tigs?

 

[tigsfan]

Baseball Beckett - October 2009 issue

 

[scittlz]

This means that Osterman most likely refused to sign any of the cards and/or they never got returned to Topps. What value do you think the Osterman would've got trade wise? I think it is fair considering the Hamm books for $200!

$200?! That seems really high...

 

[Bluedevil19]

its a 2007 and i belive its numbered to 200 but im not sure and that does seem pretty high. Anybody else have anything to help me?

 

[tndcollectables]

cmb if its available