bgomourto said:As a Blazer fan all my comments from this point forward are said with Blazer-colored glasses on. That being said, I think it's too early to jump off the Oden ship. Would they be better right now? Almost definately. The only reason they wouldn't be is if, for some reason, Durant and Roy couldn't play together. In the long run, say in the next 2-4 years, if Oden stays healthy, Oden is the correct pick. Look at the box scores and say what you want about Oden, but he is a game changer. I've watched just about every game he's played and the presence he brings on defense changes what the opposition does. That will only get more pronounced as he matures and can stay out of foul trouble.
The problem I see with Durant on the Blazers is on the defensive end. You would have a starting line-up of:
Blake
Roy
Durant
Aldridge
Pryzbilla
That gives you one defensive player in the middle. Coming off the bench is then:
Channing Frye at center? (another move may have been made to upgrade this position)
Outlaw at PF?
Batum at SF
Rudy at SG
Sergio/Bayless at PG
Now you have a second team with one defensive player and a well-undersized PF.
That starting line-up would scare any team on the offensive end, that's for sure. I hope that Oden can shake these early problems, get his head right and continue to develop. He is a beast out there at times and I look for him to be able to expand that in the very near future.
What? All 3 of them :box:
haha
But i dont think Durant on the Blazers would make a huge difference right now - they have no trouble scoring, Durant would just give more scoring...someone like Al Horford would be interesting in place of Oden
But i agree with the OP - Oden = Sam Bowie V2