GotGibson?
Bench Warmer
The first three losses in the Atlanta Hawks' current four-game losing streak -- a loss at Cleveland sandwiched by home losses to Cleveland and New York -- were marked by fast starts squandered through an inability to score late in games. The Hawks built leads of 10, 17 and 15 points, respectively, in those games, averaging 126.9 points per 100 possessions while building those leads over the first two-thirds of the games before giving the leads back by averaging 73.4 points per 100 possessions over the final third of the games.
The efficient version of the Hawks' offense featured the entirety of the rotation moving with and without the ball, working together in the pursuit of easy shots and taking advantage of transition opportunities. The inefficient, lead-blowing version of the offense featured a willfully slow, exclusively half-court attack predicated on Joe Johnson, in isolation, trying to break down as many defenders as the opposition chose to throw at him before he took a contested shot or found, late in the shot clock, a teammate who was then forced to take a jump shot of his own.
In Monday night's 92-75 blowout defeat in Miami, the Hawks passed on building an early lead in order to put the inefficient version of the offense on display for the entire 48 minutes in all its stagnant, jump-shooting glory. Forty-one of Atlanta's 71 field goal attempts were jump shots. They made just 11 of those as they scored 91.1 points per 100 possessions, 21 percent below their season average entering the game.
If Jamal Crawford had not mitigated his poor shooting from the field by making 12-of-13 free throws, the Hawks wouldn't even have managed those 75 points. Joe Johnson, the only other Hawk who reached double figures, needed 15 shots to score 11 points.
Even the typically efficient Al Horford and Josh Smith lingered on the perimeter and combined for just 16 points on 19 field goal attempts and eight free throw attempts.
It was not only execution but also effort that failed the Hawks. Their highly efficient offense has been predicated on decent field goal shooting over a large number of field goal attempts courtesy of not turning the ball over and rebounding their own misses at a high rate. Though they kept the turnovers to a minimum, they grabbed just seven of 46 possible offensive rebounds, thus attempting eight fewer field goals than Miami in addition to making their attempts far less frequently. At their best, the Hawks also take full advantage of the opportunities for transition offense that their otherwise slightly-above-average defense creates.
Miami didn't allow the Hawks those opportunities, both by taking care of the ball and attacking the offensive glass. Atlanta tallied just four fast-break points.
Until the Hawks demonstrate the ability to create high-percentage shots through a diverse half-court offensive attack, the game plan for stifling them won't change. That it took more than a quarter of the season for that game plan to become consistently effective speaks to the team's potential.
Bret LaGree writes about the Atlanta Hawks at the TrueHoop Network blog hoopinion.
The efficient version of the Hawks' offense featured the entirety of the rotation moving with and without the ball, working together in the pursuit of easy shots and taking advantage of transition opportunities. The inefficient, lead-blowing version of the offense featured a willfully slow, exclusively half-court attack predicated on Joe Johnson, in isolation, trying to break down as many defenders as the opposition chose to throw at him before he took a contested shot or found, late in the shot clock, a teammate who was then forced to take a jump shot of his own.
In Monday night's 92-75 blowout defeat in Miami, the Hawks passed on building an early lead in order to put the inefficient version of the offense on display for the entire 48 minutes in all its stagnant, jump-shooting glory. Forty-one of Atlanta's 71 field goal attempts were jump shots. They made just 11 of those as they scored 91.1 points per 100 possessions, 21 percent below their season average entering the game.
If Jamal Crawford had not mitigated his poor shooting from the field by making 12-of-13 free throws, the Hawks wouldn't even have managed those 75 points. Joe Johnson, the only other Hawk who reached double figures, needed 15 shots to score 11 points.
Even the typically efficient Al Horford and Josh Smith lingered on the perimeter and combined for just 16 points on 19 field goal attempts and eight free throw attempts.
It was not only execution but also effort that failed the Hawks. Their highly efficient offense has been predicated on decent field goal shooting over a large number of field goal attempts courtesy of not turning the ball over and rebounding their own misses at a high rate. Though they kept the turnovers to a minimum, they grabbed just seven of 46 possible offensive rebounds, thus attempting eight fewer field goals than Miami in addition to making their attempts far less frequently. At their best, the Hawks also take full advantage of the opportunities for transition offense that their otherwise slightly-above-average defense creates.
Miami didn't allow the Hawks those opportunities, both by taking care of the ball and attacking the offensive glass. Atlanta tallied just four fast-break points.
Until the Hawks demonstrate the ability to create high-percentage shots through a diverse half-court offensive attack, the game plan for stifling them won't change. That it took more than a quarter of the season for that game plan to become consistently effective speaks to the team's potential.
Bret LaGree writes about the Atlanta Hawks at the TrueHoop Network blog hoopinion.
