I had an interesting thought today concerning autographs, or at least the number of autographs we see these days, and how they may help or hurt the hobby.
On one hand, if it weren't for the autographs there might not be as many people in the hobby. Look at how many people in this hobby ONLY "collect" autographed cards. I think a lot of people, even those who aren't avid card collectors, can appreciate how cool it is to have an autographed card of your favorite player(s).
On the other hand, and where I really did a lot of pondering, is how does the number of autographs we see today hurt the hobby? I think this mass number of autographs is really what drives this wall street mentality among collectors that we see more and more all the time. Is it possible that autographs, while highly sought after by collectors, have actually added to the shortage of actual collectors?
I believe I may even fall into this category as a perfect example of what I'm talking about. While I do have specific criteria for things that I collect, I'm not the same kind of collector I was when I was younger. When I was younger I opened packs of cards because I wanted to get all of the cards in specific sets. Why? Because that's what everyone was doing. It was very important back then to get all the cards in a set, and we had fun chasing those cards that we didn't already have. With the introduction of autographs, a lot of people (myself included) store all of their base cards in boxes likely to never be seen again.
Don't get me wrong, there are still a lot of set collectors, but the fact that we actually call them "set collectors" rather than just "collectors" just proves my point even more.
It's not something that will change now, but what do you think would become of the hobby if manufacturers completely did away with autographed cards?
On one hand, if it weren't for the autographs there might not be as many people in the hobby. Look at how many people in this hobby ONLY "collect" autographed cards. I think a lot of people, even those who aren't avid card collectors, can appreciate how cool it is to have an autographed card of your favorite player(s).
On the other hand, and where I really did a lot of pondering, is how does the number of autographs we see today hurt the hobby? I think this mass number of autographs is really what drives this wall street mentality among collectors that we see more and more all the time. Is it possible that autographs, while highly sought after by collectors, have actually added to the shortage of actual collectors?
I believe I may even fall into this category as a perfect example of what I'm talking about. While I do have specific criteria for things that I collect, I'm not the same kind of collector I was when I was younger. When I was younger I opened packs of cards because I wanted to get all of the cards in specific sets. Why? Because that's what everyone was doing. It was very important back then to get all the cards in a set, and we had fun chasing those cards that we didn't already have. With the introduction of autographs, a lot of people (myself included) store all of their base cards in boxes likely to never be seen again.
Don't get me wrong, there are still a lot of set collectors, but the fact that we actually call them "set collectors" rather than just "collectors" just proves my point even more.
It's not something that will change now, but what do you think would become of the hobby if manufacturers completely did away with autographed cards?