BREAKING NEWS: A-Rod tested positive for 'roids in '03

HiEnd

Bench Warmer
From SI.COM

In 2003, when he won the American League home run title and the AL Most Valuable Player award as a shortstop for the Texas Rangers, Alex Rodriguez tested positive for two anabolic steroids, four sources have independently told Sports Illustrated.

Rodriguez's name appears on a list of 104 players who tested positive for performance-enhancing drugs in Major League Baseball's '03 survey testing, SI's sources say. As part of a joint agreement with the MLB Players Association, the testing was conducted to determine if it was necessary to impose mandatory random drug testing across the major leagues in 2004.

When approached by an SI reporter on Thursday at a gym in Miami, Rodriguez declined to discuss his 2003 test results. "You'll have to talk to the union," said Rodriguez, the Yankees' third baseman since his trade to New York in February 2004. When asked if there was an explanation for his positive test, he said, "I'm not saying anything."

Phone messages left by SI for players' union executive director Donald Fehr were not returned.

Though MLB's drug policy has expressly prohibited the use of steroids without a valid prescription since 1991, there were no penalties for a positive test in 2003. The results of that year's survey testing of 1,198 players were meant to be anonymous under the agreement between the commissioner's office and the players association. Rodriguez's testing information was found, however, after federal agents, armed with search warrants, seized the '03 test results from Comprehensive Drug Testing, Inc., of Long Beach, Calif., one of two labs used by MLB in connection with that year's survey testing. The seizure took place in April 2004 as part of the government's investigation into 10 major league players linked to the BALCO scandal -- though Rodriguez himself has never been connected to BALCO.

The list of the 104 players whose urine samples tested positive is under seal in California. However, two sources familiar with the evidence that the government has gathered in its investigation of steroid use in baseball and two other sources with knowledge of the testing results have told Sports Illustrated that Rodriguez is one of the 104 players identified as having tested positive, in his case for testosterone and an anabolic steroid known by the brand name Primobolan. All four sources spoke on the condition of anonymity due to the sensitive nature of the evidence.

Primobolan, which is also known by the chemical name methenolone, is an injected or orally administered drug that is more expensive than most steroids. (A 12-week cycle can cost $500.) It improves strength and maintains lean muscle with minimal bulk development, according to steroid experts, and has relatively few side effects. Kirk Radomski, the former New York Mets clubhouse employee who in 2007 pleaded guilty to illegal distribution of steroids to numerous major league players, described in his recent book, Bases Loaded: The Inside Story of the Steroid Era in Baseball by the Central Figure in the Mitchell Report, how players increasingly turned to drugs such as Primobolan in 2003, in part to avoid detection in testing. Primobolan is detectable for a shorter period of time than the steroid previously favored by players, Deca-Durabolin. According to a search of FDA records, Primobolan is not an approved prescription drug in the United States, nor was it in 2003. (Testosterone can be taken legally with an appropriate medical prescription.)

Rodriguez finished the 2003 season by winning his third straight league home run title (with 47) and the first of his three MVP awards.

Because more than 5% of big leaguers had tested positive in 2003, baseball instituted a mandatory random-testing program, with penalties, in '04. According to the 2007 Mitchell Report on steroid use in baseball, in September 2004, Gene Orza, the chief operating officer of the players' union, violated an agreement with MLB by tipping off a player (not named in the report) about an upcoming, supposedly unannounced drug test. Three major league players who spoke to SI said that Rodriguez was also tipped by Orza in early September 2004 that he would be tested later that month. Rodriguez declined to respond on Thursday when asked about the warning Orza provided him.

When Orza was asked on Friday in the union's New York City office about the tipping allegations, he told a reporter, "I'm not interested in discussing this information with you."

Anticipating that the 33-year-old Rodriguez, who has 553 career home runs, could become the game's alltime home run king, the Yankees signed him in November 2007 to a 10-year, incentive-laden deal that could be worth as much as $305 million. Rodriguez is reportedly guaranteed $275 million and could receive a $6 million bonus each time he ties one of the four players at the top of the list: Willie Mays (660), Babe Ruth (714), Hank Aaron (755) and Barry Bonds (762), and an additional $6 million for passing Bonds. In order to receive the incentive money, the contract reportedly requires Rodriguez to make extra promotional appearances and sign memorabilia for the Yankees as part of a marketing plan surrounding his pursuit of Bonds's record. Two sources familiar with Rodriguez's contract told SI that there is no language about steroids in the contract that would put Rodriguez at risk of losing money.

Arguments before an 11-judge panel in the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit in Pasadena are ongoing between government prosecutors and the players' association over the government's seizure of the test results from the Long Beach lab. The agents who collected the material had a search warrant only for the results for the 10 BALCO-linked players. Attorneys from the union argue that the government is entitled only to the results for those players, not the entire list. If the court sides with the union, federal authorities may be barred from using the positive survey test results of non-BALCO players such as Rodriguez in their ongoing investigations
 
NO big shock here.... so much for the MLB's "golden boy"

all those arguments and conversations of

"I CANT WAIT TIL A-ROD SMASHES THE CAREER HR RECORD SO THAT CHEATER BONDS WILL BE DONE"

just ended ;)
 
Just goes to show how good Griffey was in his prime,and his numbers might be the only pure ones left when all is said & done
 
Griffey was AMAZING if it EVER comes out that he used... I would quit watching MLB forever lol

his swing is purer than...uh.... it's pure lol
 
Biggest star not to use steroids now falls on the hands of... Miguel Cabrera! Albert Pujols! Ryan Howard! Prince Fielder!

Man, we are doomed now.:( Can the NBA take the controversy away by trying that new basketball again?:p
 
PJUOLS... he may go down before too long lol Howard... guilty LOL Fielder? uh... yea...


we always have... uh... Brad Ausmus.... and uh... um.... uh...


uh... yea... There is always Cricket LOL
 
I think Cabrera and Pujols both have used and its only a matter of time before those names come out

HOF going to alot easier to vote for soon,as there's no way any of these guys from the "steroid era" are gonna get in
 
I wouldn't be surprised if Griffey didn't use once or twice either. The MLB is and has always been a league of cheating.

Whether it be
Pine Tar, Steriods, Watering the dirt down to slow fast teams down, stealing signs, doctoring baseballs, triple-dipping bats to make them harder, corked bats, spit balls, vaseline....

It would be pretty difficult to find that many ways of cheating in any other sports, the closest to it would have to be FB with altered jerseys, sign stealing, taping, anything that the Pats try.
 
Admin said:
I wouldn't be surprised if Griffey didn't use once or twice either. The MLB is and has always been a league of cheating.

Whether it be
Pine Tar, Steriods, Watering the dirt down to slow fast teams down, stealing signs, doctoring baseballs, triple-dipping bats to make them harder, corked bats, spit balls, vaseline....

It would be pretty difficult to find that many ways of cheating in any other sports, the closest to it would have to be FB with altered jerseys, sign stealing, taping, anything that the Pats try.


the difference in THOSE "ways of cheating"and steroids is that STEROIDS ARE ILLEGAL... like AGAINST THE LAW lol tht is the issue... no one cares that the guys are cheating at baseball..they care that it has tainted an American past time and that it is ILLEGAL to use steroids...wait...it is


right? LOL
 
Sure, alot of people care if they are cheating. If they didn't care, they wouldn't have the rules in place to prevent that. While steriods affects all fans, fans who don't watch the game much get turned off by any reports of cheating in the game. No matter how large or small. At this point in time though, I think it would be easier to list the people that didn't cheat then the people that did cheat.

ac-n-mike said:
the difference in THOSE "ways of cheating"and steroids is that STEROIDS ARE ILLEGAL... like AGAINST THE LAW lol tht is the issue... no one cares that the guys are cheating at baseball..they care that it has tainted an American past time and that it is ILLEGAL to use steroids...wait...it is


right? LOL
 
Back
Top