Brad
Bench Warmer
http://www.startribune.com/535/story/1218419.html
The parents claim that there were no warning labels, but there are ones on the can. This should be thrown out soon.
3Ms response
The parents claim that there were no warning labels, but there are ones on the can. This should be thrown out soon.
The parents argued that 3M should have known that teenagers frequently abuse aerosols, solvents and dust removers in a practice known as "dusting" or "huffing" that produces an inexpensive high. Adequate warning labels could have saved their child, the couple argue in their suit.
3Ms response
Fleming added that the product "does have a warning on the label. It says that 'Intentional misuse by deliberately concentrating and inhaling the contents may be harmful and fatal.' "
Last edited by a moderator: